
Close the gap in your detection and response coverage
Bridge the ops gap: See what works. Fix what doesn’t.

A purple team assessment is a collaborative adversarial exercise. Offensive Security Certified Professional (OSCP) and CREST Registered Penetration Tester (CRT)-certified operators execute MITRE ATT&CK-mapped techniques openly alongside your blue team. After each technique, both sides review what was detected, what was missed, and what needs tuning before moving to the next step. Unlike a red team assessment — which tests end-to-end resilience covertly — a purple team assessment is transparent by design. It is built to identify gaps in your cybersecurity defences and improve detection coverage and response workflows during the engagement itself.

Attackers dwell longest where detection coverage is weakest
Undetected intrusions result in the worst damage

In September 2024, US officials confirmed that the China-linked advanced persistent threat group Salt Typhoon had been operating inside the networks of at least nine major telecommunications providers — including AT&T, Verizon, and Lumen — for more than a year without triggering a single security alert. Using living-off-the-land techniques, the attackers moved laterally through production infrastructure and accessed lawful intercept systems, all while evading effective detection across critical stages of the intrusion. The US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) confirmed the campaign stayed hidden for over 18 months. A purple team assessment would have identified the missing detections for lateral movement, privileged access activity, and living-off-the-land techniques before Salt Typhoon operated undetected for more than a year.
For a mature security operations function, the question is not whether attacks can be simulated, but whether your current controls detect them consistently enough to support timely triage and response. A purple team assessment gives regulators and auditors the documented, technique-level evidence of your security controls while helping your team close detection gaps during the exercise, not only after it.

How a purple team assessment improves detection coverage
Train together. Defend better. Win faster.

Based on the agreed objectives and attack scenarios, Swarmnetics works directly with your defenders in a shared test-and-tune cycle. Our operators execute techniques aligned to the MITRE ATT&CK framework, one by one, while your team validates alerting, triage, and response outcomes after each step. That lets your incident response team tune alerts, update detection rules, and refine response playbooks as the exercise runs, producing measurable gains in detection coverage instead of a post-engagement gap list alone.
Swarmnetics uses Atomic Red Team for standardised attack simulation, Caldera for automated adversary emulation, and PowerSploit for lateral movement. Testing spans five structured phases — preparation and planning, threat intelligence integration, attack execution and detection, defence analysis, and knowledge transfer — covering threat actor profiling, control mapping against your defensive strategies, and gap analysis. The objective is not to generate tool output for its own sake, but to validate which ATT&CK-mapped behaviours your team detects reliably, which detections need tuning, and where response procedures break down. This purple team exercise helps your organisation prevent, detect, and respond to attacker behaviour with stronger evidence at each step.
Yes, we are CREST accredited
Our core team is based in Singapore and consists of CREST certified penetration testers who are also Offensive Security Certified Professional (OSCP) certified. The team has delivered numerous penetration testing projects for customers in Singapore and other locations, from large multinational enterprises to small and medium business, and across various industries.

Purple team assessment: controls under test
Because the best lessons come under pressure

A purple team assessment evaluates your ability to prevent, detect, and respond across:
- Initial access techniques: exploitation of public-facing systems and valid account abuse
- Persistence mechanisms: scheduled tasks, registry modifications, and backdoor implants
- Privilege escalation across local and domain boundaries
- Lateral movement via remote services, pass-the-hash, and trust exploitation
- Defence evasion: living-off-the-land binaries, log tampering, and anti-forensic techniques
- Credential access through memory dumping and network credential interception
- Command and control patterns, including DNS tunnelling and encrypted channels
- Data exfiltration controls and data loss prevention monitoring, including identified vulnerabilities in egress paths
Across these techniques, the assessment tests not only whether controls exist, but whether they generate usable detections, support analyst decision-making, and improve response effectiveness under realistic conditions.


